Fetal prematurity and fullPIERS score in preeclampsia: a retrospective study

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5327/JBG-2965-3711-153%20

Keywords:

pre-eclampsia, infant, premature, pregnancy, high-risk

Abstract

Introduction: Hypertensive disorders in pregnancy, especially preeclampsia, are major causes of maternal and fetal mortality. Preeclampsia is a multisystemic disease of unknown etiology, characterized by hypertension after the 20th week of gestation and resolves postpartum. Fetal complications include intrauterine growth restriction and prematurity, increasing the risk of delays in neuropsychomotor development and chronic diseases in childhood. The fullPIERS model was developed to assess the risk of adverse maternal outcomes. Objective: This study aims to associate the fullPIERS score with fetal prematurity to expand its clinical use. Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted with 75 patients diagnosed with preeclampsia between 2018 and 2022. Data were collected and analyzed using the chi-square method with a 95% confidence level. Results: The results showed that the average fullPIERS score was 4.77%, with a standard deviation of 11.08. The mean gestational age at delivery was 32.63 weeks, with a standard deviation of 4.16. The correlation between the fullPIERS score and gestational age at delivery was strong and negative (n=71; rs=−0.58; p<0.0001). Standardizing the evaluation and monitoring of preeclampsia with protocols that recognize the systemic inflammatory model of preeclampsia has been associated with reduced maternal morbidity and fetal complications. Conclusion: Thus, expanding the use of the fullPIERS score to predict outcomes such as retinopathy and delays in neuropsychomotor development is supported by the statistical significance of its correlation with prematurity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Secretaria de Vigilância em Saúde. Departamento de Análise de Situação de Saúde. Saúde Brasil 2011: uma análise da situação de saúde e a vigilância da saúde da mulher [Internet]. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2012 [acessado em 20 fev. 2024]. Disponível em: http://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/publicacoes/saude_brasil_2011.pdf

2. Wagner SJ, Barac S, Garovic VD. Hypertensive pregnancy disorders: current concepts. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2007;9(7):560-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-6175.2007.06695.x

3. University of British Columbia. Pre-eclampsia. Eclampsia and fetal growth restriction: fullPIERS [Internet]. [acessado em 13 maio 2024]. Disponível em: https://pre-empt.obgyn.ubc.ca/home-page/past-projects/fullpiers/

4. Khan KS, Wojdyla D, Say L, Gülmezoglu AM, Van Look PF. WHO analysis of causes of maternal death: a systematic review. Lancet. 2006;367(9516):1066-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68397-9

5. Peraçoli JC, Borges VTM, Ramos JGL, Cavalli RC, Costa SHAM, Oliveira LG, et al. Pré-eclâmpsia/eclâmpsia. São Paulo: Federação Brasileira das Associações de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia; 2018.

6. Steegers EAP, von Dadelszen P, Duvekot JJ, Pijnenborg R. Pre-eclampsia. Lancet. 2010;376(9741):631-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60279-6

7. Menzies J, Magee LA, Macnab YC, Ansermino JM, Li J, Douglas MJ, et al. Current CHS and NHBPEP criteria for severe preeclampsia do not uniformly predict adverse maternal or perinatal outcomes. Hypertens Pregnancy. 2007;26(7):447-62. https://doi.org/10.1080/10641950701521742

8. Apgar V. A proposal for a new method of evaluation of the newborn infant. Curr Res Anesth Analg. 1953;32(4):260-7. PMID: 13083014.

9. Liu L, Johnson HL, Cousens S, Perin J, Scott S, Lawn JE, et al. Global, regional, and national causes of child mortality: an updated systematic analysis for 2010 with time trends since 2000. Lancet. 2012;379(9832):2151-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60560-1

10. Bokslag A, van Weissenbruch M, Mol BW, Groot CJM. Preeclampsia; short and long-term consequences for mother and neonate. Early Hum Dev. 2016;102:47-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2016.09.007

11. von Dadelszen P, Payne B, Li J, Mark Ansermino J, Pipkin FB, Côté AM, et al. Prediction of adverse maternal outcomes in pre-eclampsia: development and validation of the fullPIERS model. Lancet. 2011;377(9761):219-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61351-7

Published

2026-02-19

How to Cite

Castro, L. G. F., Diniz, A. L. D., Hattori, W. T., & Naves, W. U. (2026). Fetal prematurity and fullPIERS score in preeclampsia: a retrospective study. Jornal Brasileiro De Ginecologia, 135. https://doi.org/10.5327/JBG-2965-3711-153

Issue

Section

Artigos Originais